728x90

Review: Peter Pan (2003)

From our provider: CommonSenseMedia
empty star empty star empty star empty star empty star Rate This Article
Common Sense Rating: PAUSE for ages 7+ Stars: 4 out of 5 (About Common Sense Ratings)
MPAA Rating: PG  adventure action sequences and peril  MPAA Rating: PG  Studio: Universal Pictures  Directed By: P.J.  Hogan  Cast: Jason Isaacs, Jeremy Sumpter, Rachel Hurd-Wood  Running Time: 100 min  Release Date: 05/04/2004  Genre: Family and Kids 

What Parents Should Know
Parents need to know that this movie is OK for early tweens who aren't frightened by a brief but graphic image of Captain Hook's amputated arm as he puts on one of his hooks. The movie has a lot of fantasy violence, including swordfights, guns, and hitting below the belt. Pirates are killed. We see boys' bare behinds. There are a couple of sweet kisses and some subtle references to puberty. Characters drink and smoke and a pirate offers liquor and cigars to a child.

Families who see this movie could talk about why someone might not want to grow up. What do grown-ups do to keep the best part of childhood inside themselves? Is that what Barrie was doing in writing this story?

Common Sense Media Review
Oh, the cleverness of storyteller James M. Barrie, who gave us Peter Pan, Captain Hook, Tinkerbell, a St. Bernard nanny, Tiger Lily, and the crocodile that ticks because it swallowed a clock! And oh, the cleverness of P.J. Hogan, the director and co-screenwriter who has brought us this sumptuously beautiful re-telling of the classic story that maintains its timeless charm.

This is the story of the Darling children, Wendy, Michael, and John, who fly to Neverland with Peter Pan, the boy who would not grow up. Neverland has pirates, mermaids, and no baths, bedtimes, or schoolwork.

But there are no mothers, either, and without mothers, there are no stories. So Peter listens to the stories that Wendy tells her brothers. One night, his shadow is caught in the window. When he comes back to get it, she sews it on, and Peter invites them back to Neverland. There they meet up with the Lost Boys, and battle Captain Hook ( Jason Isaacs, Harry Potter 's Lucius Malfoy).

The production design is simply gorgeous. A storybook Victorian London is imagined with exquisite period detail. Even state-of-the-art special effects like flying and computer graphics are consistently conceived and gratifyingly believable. The jarring notes are Peter's (unforgivably) American accent and some anachronistic-sounding music. Swimming Pool 's Ludivine Sagnier does her best, but Tinkerbell is probably best portrayed as a spot of light. And some Pan lovers will object to some gentle tweaking of the story. But it's not so much to be politically correct or bring it up to date as it is to remove any distractions from what in today's view would be seen as sexism.

The story is about growing up, after all, and it is not a coincidence that Wendy flies away with Peter on what is supposed to be her last night sleeping in the nursery with her brothers before she must start to become a young lady. But even though, like her mother, Wendy has a kiss hiding in the corner of her mouth, she is not at all sure that she wants to become a young lady. Part of the charm of the story is the way it looks at the terror and wonder of that bittersweet moment on the cusp of an adventure that can be scarier and more thrilling than a battle with pirates. Barrie thought that it was really Wendy's story, and she is the one who really makes a journey. When she kisses Peter to bring him back to life, both of them wake up.



Find More About

Member Comments On...

Review: Peter Pan (2003)

StJenna
StJenna says:
March 15, 2007

I'm a HUGE fan of J.M. Barrie's classic, so I was thrilled to see this live-action version, which was more faithful to the book than any other. I especially loved how it used the conventions of the play (e.g., having the same actor play the father and Hook). I could have done without the addition of the aunt, which served no purpose, and I had a few issues with casting. But it was still good enough that I saw it twice in three days -- once with each set of niblings.

0  | 
I found this helpful Thank You! Your vote will be tallied soon!
Not Acceptable?
300x250
300x250
Please log in ...
Close
You must be logged in to use this feature.

Thank You!

Thank you for helping us maintain a friendly, high quality community at Family.com. This comment will be reviewed by a community moderator.

Flag as Not Acceptable?

We review flagged content and enforce our Terms of Use, in which content must never be:

See full Terms of Use.